Which Agreement Against The Provision Of Law

Article 23 limits the courts, since the article is not based on the ground, to the purpose of the agreement or the transaction itself and not to the reasons that lead to it. Morris concerned a purchase agreement (the “SPA”) for shares in a company. The plaintiff received approximately £16 million in the first respect. The SPA also provided for deferred consideration through an earn-out provision relating to the applicant`s consulting services. The SPA stated that the applicant “has the opportunity” to provide its consulting services for a period of four years from the conclusion of the SPA and “another period that can reasonably be agreed” between the parties […].

Comments are closed.